Fixtures/Results
SCM 2005
Rotate device to view more data.
POS | TEAM | P | W | L | For | Ag | PC | HW | HL | AW | AL | Strk | Last5 | PCWon | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Sandringham | 24 | 21 | 3 | 2760 | 2297 | 120.16 | 10 | 2 | 11 | 1 | 6 | WWWWW | 87.50 | ||
2 | Waverley | 24 | 19 | 5 | 2490 | 2299 | 108.31 | 9 | 3 | 10 | 2 | -1 | LWWWL | 79.17 | ||
3 | Dandenong | 24 | 16 | 8 | 2424 | 2192 | 110.58 | 7 | 5 | 9 | 3 | 4 | LWWWW | 66.67 | ||
4 | Hume City | 24 | 16 | 8 | 2647 | 2492 | 106.22 | 7 | 5 | 9 | 3 | 2 | WLLWW | 66.67 | ||
5 | Diamond Valley | 24 | 15 | 9 | 2452 | 2347 | 104.47 | 10 | 2 | 5 | 7 | -1 | LLWWL | 62.50 | ||
6 | Sherbrooke | 24 | 15 | 9 | 2699 | 2490 | 108.39 | 7 | 5 | 8 | 4 | 2 | LLLWW | 62.50 | ||
7 | Melbourne | 24 | 14 | 10 | 2533 | 2496 | 101.48 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 4 | -1 | WWLWL | 58.33 | ||
8 | Warrnambool | 24 | 14 | 10 | 2685 | 2604 | 103.11 | 9 | 3 | 5 | 7 | -1 | WWWWL | 58.33 | ||
9 | Shepparton | 24 | 9 | 15 | 2368 | 2565 | 92.32 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 9 | 1 | LLWLW | 37.50 | ||
10 | Eltham | 24 | 9 | 15 | 2421 | 2499 | 96.88 | 4 | 8 | 5 | 7 | -3 | LWLLL | 37.50 | ||
11 | Werribee | 24 | 6 | 18 | 2185 | 2465 | 88.64 | 3 | 9 | 3 | 9 | 1 | WLLLW | 25.00 | ||
12 | Ringwood | 24 | 5 | 19 | 2374 | 2636 | 90.06 | 3 | 9 | 2 | 10 | 3 | LLWWW | 20.83 | ||
13 | Latrobe City | 24 | 5 | 19 | 2176 | 2426 | 89.69 | 3 | 9 | 2 | 10 | -3 | WWLLL | 20.83 | ||
14 | Bulleen | 24 | 4 | 20 | 2444 | 2850 | 85.75 | 3 | 9 | 1 | 11 | -13 | LLLLL | 16.67 |
Ladder Note
Dandenong claim 3rd position over Hume City due to head to head advantageDiamond Valley claim 5th position over Sherbrooke due to head to head advantage
Melbourne claim 7th poisition over Warrnambool due to head to head advantage
Shepparton claim 9th position over Eltham due to head to head advantage
Ringwood claim 12th position over Latrobe City due to head to head advantage